Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 00204
Original file (PD 2014 00204.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX     CASE: PD-2014-00204
BRANCH OF SERVICE: NAVY  BOARD DATE: 20140829
SEPARATION DATE: 20071125


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty LN2/E-5 (Legalman) medically separated for chronic right shoulder impingement with acromioclavicular arthrosis. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of her rating or satisfy physical fitness standards. She was placed on limited duty (LIMDU) and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The chronic right shoulder condition, characterized as “other affections of shoulder region, not elsewhere classified and osteoarthrosis, unspecified whether generalized or localized, shoulder region,” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW SECNAVINST 1850.4E. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic right shoulder impingement with acromioclavicular arthrosis” as fit to continue on Active Duty. The CI non-concurred with the IPEB findings, thus requested and was granted Formal PEB (FPEB). The FEB reviewed the IPEB proceedings, re-adjudicated the “chronic right shoulder impingement with acromioclavicular arthrosis” condition as unfitting, and rated at 20%. The CI made no further appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “I do not feel 10% is a high enough rating for my shoulder & shoulder blade because I am in constant pain & it only continues to get worse.” [sic]


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The ratings for the unfitting chronic right shoulder impingement with acromioclavicular arthrosis and status post arthroscopic subacromial decompression and distal clavicle excision and revision distal clavicle excision conditions are addressed below and, the cervical neuropathy condition is considered a contended condition and is also in scope as it potentially related to the CI’s shoulder condition.
No additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Naval Records.



 RATING COMPARISON :

Service FPEB – Dated 20070827
 VA - (4 Years 4 Months Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic Right Shoulder Impingement With Acromioclavicular Arthrosis 5201 20% Impingement, Right Shoulder with Scar (also claimed as tendonitis) 5201-5019 10% 20120409
Status Post Arthroscopic Subacromial Decompression And Distal Clavicle Excision And Revision Distal Clavicle Excision CAT II
Cervical Neuropathy CAT III Cervical Strain 5237 10% 20120409
Other x 0 (Not in Scope)
 Other x 2
Combined: 20%
 Combined: 40%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 20 120830 (most proximate to date of separation)


ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Chronic Right Shoulder Impingement with Acromioclavicular Arthrosis Condition. The CI was right handed. The evidence of record including the narrative summary, treatment records, CI’s formal petition and FPEB documented the CI’s shoulder injury and two surgeries in 2005 (subacromial decompression and two distal right clavicle excisions). There was aggressive post-surgical treatment which included both physical therapy and injections, although the CI continued to complain of shoulder pain and limited motion. Treatment notes indicated recurrent synovitis and synovitis (fluid in the joint) of the right shoulder through July 2007. The CI was not considered a candidate for further surgeries and was taking narcotic and non-narcotic pain medication.

At the MEB exam (approximately 8 months prior to separation), the CI reported chronic right shoulder pain, inability to raise her arm over her head due to pain and difficulty sleeping. Exam documented limited painful range-of-motion (ROM) to 170 degrees flexion and 160 degrees abduction (180 degrees normal) and tenderness. There was normal strength of the shoulder muscles and no instability (5/5 rotator cuff strength, negative apprehension, negative instability, negative Speed, negative impingement sign and negative O'Brien sign). The DD Form 2808 exam documented normal sensation distal to the surgical areas. At the FPEB and in her petition the CI complained of pain with sitting and desk-type work. The FPEB exam indicated right shoulder pain-limited motion to 90 degrees of flexion and extension (180 degrees normal) without winging of the shoulder blade (indicating good muscle strength). The CI “gestured using her left (non-dominant) hand” [indicating guarding of the right arm].

At the VA Compensation and Pension exam performed 4 years after separation, the CI reported continued right shoulder pain. Exam documented tenderness, guarding and painful and limited ROM of flexion 150 degrees and abduction 110 degrees (normal 180 degrees) after repetitive motion testing. Strength was normal for abduction and flexion. Elbow wrist and finger strength was normal. The VA rated this exam at 10% for painful motion.

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The FPEB documented the most limited ROM (90 degrees flexion/abduction) of the probative exams and the PEB awarded 20% under disability code 5201 (Arm, limitation of motion “at shoulder level”). For a higher rating, the ROM would have to be limited “midway between side and shoulder level” (45 degrees). There was no indication of that degree of shoulder impairment and there were no other more favorable coding options for the shoulder condition. Considering the totality of the evidence and mindful of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) §4.3 (reasonable doubt), members agreed that a disability rating of 20% for the right shoulder condition was appropriately recommended in this case. The Board concluded therefore that this condition could not be recommended for additional disability rating.

Contended FPEB Conditions. The Board’s main charge is to assess the fairness of the FPEB’s determination that the contended cervical neuropathy condition was not unfitting. The Board’s threshold for countering fitness determinations is higher than the VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt) standard used for its rating recommendations, but remains adherent to the DoDI 6040.44 “fair and equitable” standard. The cervical neuropathy condition was not indicated under any LIMDU. The non-medical assessment commander’s statement specifically mentions only the shoulder condition as duty impairing. The record shows an entry in November 2005, approximately 2 years prior to separation, indicating fair ROM of the neck with decreased right C7 area reflex and strength, with an assessment of “neuropathy probably secondary to mild degenerative joint disease of the cervical spine.” Further orthopedic exams indicated improvement in the neck condition with discomfort on full ROM, good strength and no neurologic deficits. The 2006 orthopedic notes indicated shoulder pain was most likely from scaring from the shoulder surgeries (not from the neck). Examinations more proximate to separation did not mention any evidence of cervical neuropathy aside from intermittent symptoms. The Board considered that the right shoulder symptoms may have overlapped with any symptoms from a cervical neuropathy; however, there was scant evidence of any abnormality of the cervical spine or of a fixed cervical neuropathy that would rise to the level of being unfitting. After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the FPEB fitness determination for the contended cervical neuropathy condition and so no additional disability ratings are recommended.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the right shoulder condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. In the matter of the contended cervical neuropathy condition, the Board unanimously recommends no change from the FPEB determination as not unfitting. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.
The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20131216, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record









                 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review


MEMORANDUM FOR DIRECTOR, SECRETARY OF THE NAVY COUNCIL OF REVIEW
BOARDS

Subj: PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW (PDBR) RECOMMENDATIONS

Ref: (a) DoDI 6040.44
(b) CORB ltr dtd 22 Apr 15

In accordance with reference (a), I have reviewed the cases forwarded by reference (b), and, for the reasons provided in their forwarding memorandums, approve the recommendations of the PDBR that the following individual’s records not be corrected to reflect a change in either characterization of separation or in the disability rating previously assigned by the Department of the Navy’s Physical Evaluation Board:
- XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USMC
- XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USN
- XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USMC
- XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USN
- XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USMC
- XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USN
- XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USN
- XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USMC
- XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USN
- XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USMC
- XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USN


                                                      XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                            Assistant General Counsel
                  (Manpower & Reserve Affairs)

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00056

    Original file (PD2013 00056.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The PEBadjudicated “chronic right shoulder pain, status post distal clavicle excision, and pain rated as slight, not requiring daily narcotic therapy and frequent” as unfitting, rated 10%, citing criteria of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. The Board evaluates DVA evidence proximal to separation in arriving at its recommendations, but its authority resides in evaluating the fairness of DES fitness decisions and rating...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02743

    Original file (PD-2013-02743.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Pre-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Left Shoulder Pain (non-dominant)5099-500310%Residuals S/P Left Shoulder Surgeries5201-502410%20061114Other x 2 (Not In Scope)Other x 1 RATING: 10%RATING: 10% *Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20070404(most proximate to date of separation (DOS)). The VA rated the left shoulder pain (residuals, status post left shoulder surgeries X3) at 10% coded 5201-5024 (limitation of shoulder motion - tenosynovitis) citing painful...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01676

    Original file (PD-2014-01676.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SEPARATION DATE: 20030212 Neck Condition . Right Shoulder Condition .

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00131

    Original file (PD2013 00131.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The MEB forwarded right shoulder pain s/p arthroscopic subacromial decompression and distal clavicle excision to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501.The MEB also identified and forwarded left ankle pain as medically acceptable.The PEBadjudicated the chronic right shoulder pain as unfitting, rated 0%with specified application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy.The left ankle pain condition was determined to meet retention standards and thereforewas...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00731

    Original file (PD-2014-00731.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The examiner noted that most of the CI’s pain was from his elbow. An orthopedic follow-up on 30 April 2004 noted that the CI continued to have some shoulder crepitus and pain.At the MEB examination on 11 February 2004, 6 months prior to separation, the CI reported chronic right shoulder pain. Providing a correction to the individual’s separation document showing that the individual was separated by reason of permanent disability retirement effective the date of the original medical...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00630

    Original file (PD-2014-00630.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Left Shoulder Condition . At the VA C&P examination, performed 16 months prior to separation, the CI reported a cervical spine injury in 1998 with continual pain accompanied by a left upper extremity radiculopathy. Based on the ROMs in the record the Board was unable to find a route to a higher rating.The MEB referred cervical spondylosis with C7-8 radiculopathy; however, the PEB noted cervical spondylosis “without significant neurologic abnormality.” The Board considered whether an...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01870

    Original file (PD-2014-01870.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Right Shoulder Pain5299-520220%Acromioclavicular Separation of the R/Shoulder w/Tendinitis, Bursitis, and Impingement520120%20061218Other x 0 (Not In Scope)Other x 9 RATING: 20%RATING: 40% *Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20080904(most proximate to date of separation [DOS]). Chronic Right Shoulder Pain Condition . BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00416

    Original file (PD2011-00416.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PEB adjudicated the left shoulder condition as unfitting, rated 10%, citing criteria of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. Left Shoulder Neuropathy Condition . In addition to the intrinsic joint pathology contributing the CI’s unfitting “left shoulder pain” condition, there was a contribution from a separately ratable peripheral nerve injury (as per the VA rating) which the Board must consider in this case.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01540

    Original file (PD-2013-01540.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In 2005 I was only medical boarded and rated 20% for my Right Shoulder. The Board considered that following the two surgeries, the CI had painful limited left shoulder ROM with evidence of posttraumatic arthritis on X-rays. Physical Disability Board of Review

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01072

    Original file (PD2012 01072.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEWNAME: XXXXXX BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army CASE NUMBER: PD1201072SEPARATION DATE: 20021213 He was issued a permanent U3 profile (131111) andreferred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB).The MEB forwarded no other conditions for Physical Evaluation Board(PEB) adjudication.The PEB adjudicated his shoulder condition as unfitting, rated 0%, with application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. In the matter of the...